ICE Riots ERUPT – Newsom BLAMED!

Amid violent protests over ICE enforcement in Los Angeles, GOP Vice Chair Patrick Gipson lashes out at Governor Gavin Newsom for his ineffectual response and decision-making.

At a Glance

• Patrick Gipson criticizes Governor Newsom’s handling of ICE protests in Los Angeles.
• Escalating unrest and lawlessness in the city is noted by Gipson, linking it to leadership failures.
• California Governor is labeled reactionary, with Gipson arguing against his leadership approach.
• Gipson highlights the state’s failure to adequately support local law enforcement.

Governor Newsom’s Ineffective Response

In the heart of Los Angeles, what began as peaceful protests against federal immigration raids has now erupted into violent riots. Patrick Gipson, the LA County GOP Vice Chair and a former sheriff’s deputy, is openly condemning Governor Gavin Newsom for his handling of the situation. Newsom’s response, particularly his reluctance to deploy the National Guard, is criticized by Gipson as ineffective and negligent.

Watch coverage here.

Governor Newsom criticized President Trump’s intervention as chaotic, even though the Pentagon confirmed the deployment of approximately 700 Marines to maintain order. Meanwhile, LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell has expressed concerns about complications arising from additional forces. Despite these complexities, Gipson argues that swift deployment of the National Guard could have quelled the chaos, a sentiment echoed by frustrated residents and officers alike.

Watch coverage here.

Blame Game with Real Consequences

Governor Newsom has attempted to shift blame onto President Trump for escalating tensions. However, this political maneuvering detracts from actionable solutions. Gipson emphatically states, “These riots, they’re completely unnecessary. We didn’t have to go to this length to see cars burning, businesses looted, livelihoods destroyed. It could’ve all been avoided.” Such sentiments resonate strongly among those who value decisive leadership.

“These riots, they’re completely unnecessary. We didn’t have to go to this length to see cars burning, businesses looted, livelihoods destroyed. It could’ve all been avoided.” – Patrick Gipson.

Gipson has not only criticized Newsom but also Mayor Karen Bass, suggesting that she is overly influenced by the Governor’s reactionary style of governance. This perceived political alliance has led to an unfortunate paralysis in leadership at critical moments. Gipson insists that the state’s soft-on-crime policies contribute to lawlessness, and Proposition 36 has not been enforced adequately. Such criticism suggests a complete breakdown in maintaining law and order.

Unwavering Need for Strong Leadership

The climate of fear among residents and officers still looms large, exacerbated by low morale among local law enforcement. Gipson argues for a need for accountability and steadfast consequences, an approach that promotes safety and stability. The political squabble only hinders progress, leaving both state and federal authorities involved in a tense standoff.

“Newsom is reactionary instead of pro-action. If he had called in the National Guard earlier, we would’ve saved billions of dollars in insurance claims and protected our small businesses.” – Patrick Gipson.

As the city struggles to regain control, the criticism from leaders like Gipson makes it clear: Los Angeles deserves a government that prioritizes proactive measures over political posturing. Until then, enduring frustration over extreme leftist governance will continue to resonate amongst Los Angeles’ beleaguered citizens.